Comparison
Audemars Piguet 15400ST.OO.1220ST.01 vs Orient TAA02004B9
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Orient TAA02004B9 is 0.5 mm larger (41.5 mm vs 41 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
- Orient TAA02004B9 is in current production; Audemars Piguet 15400ST.OO.1220ST.01 is discontinued.
| Spec | 15400ST.OO.1220ST.01 | TAA02004B9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Audemars Piguet | Orient |
| Family | Royal Oak | Diver |
| Reference | 15400ST.OO.1220ST.01 | TAA02004B9 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Discontinued | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 41 mm | 41.5 mm |
| Orient TAA02004B9 is 0.5 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | unknown | Orient F6922 |
| Winding | unknown | Automatic |
| Power reserve | unknown | 40 hours |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |