Comparison
Bell & Ross 03-92 AERO GT vs Bell & Ross BR01-CM-203
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both belong to the Bell & Ross Collection family.
- Bell & Ross 03-92 AERO GT uses an automatic movement; Bell & Ross BR01-CM-203 uses a manual one.
- Bell & Ross 03-92 AERO GT has a stainless steel case; Bell & Ross BR01-CM-203 is in titanium.
| Spec | 03-92 AERO GT | BR01-CM-203 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Bell & Ross | Bell & Ross |
| Family | Collection | Collection |
| Reference | 03-92 AERO GT | BR01-CM-203 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Titanium |
| Diameter | unknown | unknown |
| Movement | Automatic | Manual |
| Caliber | Bell & Ross 318 | Bell & Ross 203 |
| Winding | Automatic | Manual |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |