Comparison
Bulova 96B251 vs Casio MRW-200H
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Bulova 96B251 is 0.4 mm larger (45 mm vs 44.6 mm).
- Bulova 96B251 has a stainless steel case; Casio MRW-200H is in resin.
| Spec | 96B251 | MRW-200H |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Bulova | Casio |
| Family | Archive Series | Classic |
| Reference | 96B251 | MRW-200H |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Resin |
| Diameter | 45 mm | 44.6 mm |
| Bulova 96B251 is 0.4 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | unknown | Casio 5125 |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |