Comparison
Bulova 97B169 vs Casio EFR-571MDC
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio EFR-571MDC is 0.6 mm larger (47.1 mm vs 46.5 mm).
- Bulova 97B169 has a yellow gold case; Casio EFR-571MDC is in stainless steel.
| Spec | 97B169 | EFR-571MDC |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Bulova | Casio |
| Family | Wilton | Edifice |
| Reference | 97B169 | EFR-571MDC |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Yellow gold | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 46.5 mm | 47.1 mm |
| Casio EFR-571MDC is 0.6 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | unknown | Casio 5653 |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |