Comparison
Cartier WB710009 vs Casio LW-200
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio LW-200 is 0.1 mm larger (34.9 mm vs 34.8 mm).
| Spec | WB710009 | LW-200 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Cartier | Casio |
| Family | Tank | Classic |
| Reference | WB710009 | LW-200 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | unknown | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | unknown | Resin |
| Diameter | 34.8 mm | 34.9 mm |
| Casio LW-200 is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | unknown | Casio 2672 |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |