Comparison
Casio A1000A vs Casio MWA-300H
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both belong to the Casio Classic family.
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio MWA-300H is 12.9 mm larger (50.9 mm vs 38 mm).
- Casio A1000A has a stainless steel case; Casio MWA-300H is in resin.
| Spec | A1000A | MWA-300H |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Casio |
| Family | Classic | Classic |
| Reference | A1000A | MWA-300H |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Resin |
| Diameter | 38 mm | 50.9 mm |
| Casio MWA-300H is 12.9 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3479 | Casio 5747 |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |