Comparison
Casio A100WE vs Seiko 18606935
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Seiko 18606935 is 0.2 mm larger (32.9 mm vs 32.7 mm).
- Casio A100WE has a resin case; Seiko 18606935 is in stainless steel.
| Spec | A100WE | 18606935 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Seiko |
| Family | Classic | Conceptual |
| Reference | A100WE | 18606935 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | unknown |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 32.7 mm | 32.9 mm |
| Seiko 18606935 is 0.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3503 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |