Comparison
Casio A158WEM vs Era 53100-357JM-NADND
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio A158WEM is 0.2 mm larger (33.2 mm vs 33 mm).
- Casio A158WEM has a resin case; Era 53100-357JM-NADND is in stainless steel.
| Spec | A158WEM | 53100-357JM-NADND |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Era |
| Family | Classic | Date |
| Reference | A158WEM | 53100-357JM-NADND |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 33.2 mm | 33 mm |
| Casio A158WEM is 0.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 593 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |