Comparison
Casio A171WEMG vs Era 53020-357JM-NADD
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Era 53020-357JM-NADD is 0.3 mm larger (38 mm vs 37.7 mm).
- Casio A171WEMG has a resin case; Era 53020-357JM-NADD is in stainless steel.
| Spec | A171WEMG | 53020-357JM-NADD |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Era |
| Family | Classic | Diver |
| Reference | A171WEMG | 53020-357JM-NADD |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 37.7 mm | 38 mm |
| Era 53020-357JM-NADD is 0.3 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 593 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |