Comparison
Casio A700W vs Titan nt1580yl05
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio A700W is 0.2 mm larger (35.5 mm vs 35.3 mm).
| Spec | A700W | nt1580yl05 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Titan |
| Family | Classic | Analog |
| Reference | A700W | nt1580yl05 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | unknown |
| Diameter | 35.5 mm | 35.3 mm |
| Casio A700W is 0.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3472 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |