Comparison
Casio ABL-100WE vs Era 10255-3BCAB-BUCIDN
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Era 10255-3BCAB-BUCIDN is 0.1 mm larger (38 mm vs 37.9 mm).
- Casio ABL-100WE has a resin case; Era 10255-3BCAB-BUCIDN is in stainless steel.
| Spec | ABL-100WE | 10255-3BCAB-BUCIDN |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Era |
| Family | Classic | Chronolady |
| Reference | ABL-100WE | 10255-3BCAB-BUCIDN |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 37.9 mm | 38 mm |
| Era 10255-3BCAB-BUCIDN is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3565 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |