Comparison
Casio AE-1200WH vs Cyma W02-00812-008
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio AE-1200WH is 0.1 mm larger (42.1 mm vs 42 mm).
- Casio AE-1200WH has a resin case; Cyma W02-00812-008 is in stainless steel.
| Spec | AE-1200WH | W02-00812-008 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Cyma |
| Family | Classic | Champion |
| Reference | AE-1200WH | W02-00812-008 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 42.1 mm | 42 mm |
| Casio AE-1200WH is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3299 | Ronda 5030D |
| Winding | unknown | Quartz |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |