Comparison
Casio AE-1600H vs Titan nu38076pp05w
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio AE-1600H is 1.33 mm larger (49.7 mm vs 48.37 mm).
- Both cases are resin.
| Spec | AE-1600H | nu38076pp05w |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Titan |
| Family | Classic | AnaDigi |
| Reference | AE-1600H | nu38076pp05w |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Resin |
| Diameter | 49.7 mm | 48.37 mm |
| Casio AE-1600H is 1.33 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3570 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |