Comparison
Casio AE-1700H vs Era 38001-TINGNAEG-GNJ
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Era 38001-TINGNAEG-GNJ is 0.7 mm larger (48 mm vs 47.3 mm).
| Spec | AE-1700H | 38001-TINGNAEG-GNJ |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Era |
| Family | Classic | Chronorally |
| Reference | AE-1700H | 38001-TINGNAEG-GNJ |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | unknown |
| Diameter | 47.3 mm | 48 mm |
| Era 38001-TINGNAEG-GNJ is 0.7 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3580 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |