Comparison
Casio AE1000W vs Rado R32259203
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio AE1000W is 0.1 mm larger (45 mm vs 44.9 mm).
- Casio AE1000W has a resin case; Rado R32259203 is in stainless steel.
| Spec | AE1000W | R32259203 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Rado |
| Family | Classic | HyperChrome |
| Reference | AE1000W | R32259203 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 45 mm | 44.9 mm |
| Casio AE1000W is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3198 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |