Comparison
Casio AQ-230A vs Cyma W02-00828-001
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Cyma W02-00828-001 is 0.2 mm larger (30 mm vs 29.8 mm).
- Casio AQ-230A has a resin case; Cyma W02-00828-001 is in stainless steel.
| Spec | AQ-230A | W02-00828-001 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Cyma |
| Family | Classic | Belle |
| Reference | AQ-230A | W02-00828-001 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 29.8 mm | 30 mm |
| Cyma W02-00828-001 is 0.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 5154 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |