Comparison
Casio EFS-S650DC vs Seiko 18386202
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a solar movement.
- Seiko 18386202 is 0.1 mm larger (41 mm vs 40.9 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
| Spec | EFS-S650DC | 18386202 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Seiko |
| Family | Edifice | Collection |
| Reference | EFS-S650DC | 18386202 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | unknown |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 40.9 mm | 41 mm |
| Seiko 18386202 is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Solar | Solar |
| Caliber | Casio 5529 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |