Comparison
Casio EQB-1300DC vs Orient RA-WJ0001E10B
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a solar movement.
- Orient RA-WJ0001E10B is 0.4 mm larger (39.9 mm vs 39.5 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
| Spec | EQB-1300DC | RA-WJ0001E10B |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Orient |
| Family | Edifice | Diver |
| Reference | EQB-1300DC | RA-WJ0001E10B |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 39.5 mm | 39.9 mm |
| Orient RA-WJ0001E10B is 0.4 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Solar | Solar |
| Caliber | Casio 5758 | Orient VS422 |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |