Comparison
Casio F-91WF vs Rado R12304303
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio F-91WF is 0.1 mm larger (35.2 mm vs 35.1 mm).
- Casio F-91WF has a resin case; Rado R12304303 is in stainless steel.
| Spec | F-91WF | R12304303 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Rado |
| Family | Classic | Original |
| Reference | F-91WF | R12304303 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 35.2 mm | 35.1 mm |
| Casio F-91WF is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 593 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |