Comparison
Casio GBA-900 vs Era 38001-TIN-NRO3
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio GBA-900 is 0.9 mm larger (48.9 mm vs 48 mm).
- Casio GBA-900 has a resin case; Era 38001-TIN-NRO3 is in titanium.
| Spec | GBA-900 | 38001-TIN-NRO3 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Era |
| Family | G-Shock | Chronorally |
| Reference | GBA-900 | 38001-TIN-NRO3 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Titanium |
| Diameter | 48.9 mm | 48 mm |
| Casio GBA-900 is 0.9 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 5641 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |