Comparison
Casio GBA-900UU vs Titan nu38076pp05w
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio GBA-900UU is 0.53 mm larger (48.9 mm vs 48.37 mm).
- Both cases are resin.
| Spec | GBA-900UU | nu38076pp05w |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Titan |
| Family | G-Shock | AnaDigi |
| Reference | GBA-900UU | nu38076pp05w |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Resin |
| Diameter | 48.9 mm | 48.37 mm |
| Casio GBA-900UU is 0.53 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 5641 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |