Comparison
Casio GBA-950 vs Titan ntth1710599w
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Titan ntth1710599w is 0.1 mm larger (44 mm vs 43.9 mm).
- Both cases are resin.
| Spec | GBA-950 | ntth1710599w |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Titan |
| Family | G-Shock | Analog |
| Reference | GBA-950 | ntth1710599w |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Resin |
| Diameter | 43.9 mm | 44 mm |
| Titan ntth1710599w is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 5737 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |