Comparison
Casio GMW-B5000BT vs Seiko HAB003J1
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a solar movement.
- Seiko HAB003J1 is 0.2 mm larger (43.4 mm vs 43.2 mm).
- Casio GMW-B5000BT has a stainless steel case; Seiko HAB003J1 is in titanium.
| Spec | GMW-B5000BT | HAB003J1 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Seiko |
| Family | G-Shock | Astron |
| Reference | GMW-B5000BT | HAB003J1 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Titanium |
| Diameter | 43.2 mm | 43.4 mm |
| Seiko HAB003J1 is 0.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Solar | Solar |
| Caliber | Casio 3539 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |