Comparison
Casio MTG-B4000 vs Seiko SSH175J1
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a solar movement.
- Casio MTG-B4000 is 1.2 mm larger (45.3 mm vs 44.1 mm).
- Casio MTG-B4000 has a carbon case; Seiko SSH175J1 is in titanium.
| Spec | MTG-B4000 | SSH175J1 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Seiko |
| Family | G-Shock | Astron |
| Reference | MTG-B4000 | SSH175J1 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Carbon | Titanium |
| Diameter | 45.3 mm | 44.1 mm |
| Casio MTG-B4000 is 1.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Solar | Solar |
| Caliber | Casio 5743 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |