Comparison
Casio MW-240 vs Glycine Airpilot Dual Time
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Glycine Airpilot Dual Time is 0.4 mm larger (44 mm vs 43.6 mm).
- Casio MW-240 has a resin case; Glycine Airpilot Dual Time is in stainless steel.
| Spec | MW-240 | Airpilot Dual Time |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Glycine |
| Family | Classic | Airpilot |
| Reference | MW-240 | Airpilot Dual Time |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 43.6 mm | 44 mm |
| Glycine Airpilot Dual Time is 0.4 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 1330 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |