Comparison
Christopher Ward C60 Trident Pro 300 vs Orient RA-AC0Q13E30B
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Christopher Ward C60 Trident Pro 300 is 0.1 mm larger (40 mm vs 39.9 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
| Spec | C60 Trident Pro 300 | RA-AC0Q13E30B |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Christopher Ward | Orient |
| Family | C60 Trident | Diver |
| Reference | C60 Trident Pro 300 | RA-AC0Q13E30B |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 40 mm | 39.9 mm |
| Christopher Ward C60 Trident Pro 300 is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | unknown | Orient F6722 |
| Winding | unknown | Automatic |
| Power reserve | unknown | 40 hours |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |