Comparison
Christopher Ward C60 Trident Pro 300 vs Rolex 116610LN
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Both cases measure 40 mm across.
- Both cases are stainless steel.
- Christopher Ward C60 Trident Pro 300 is in current production; Rolex 116610LN is discontinued.
| Spec | C60 Trident Pro 300 | 116610LN |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Christopher Ward | Rolex |
| Family | C60 Trident | Submariner |
| Reference | C60 Trident Pro 300 | 116610LN |
| Production start | unknown | 2010 |
| Production end | unknown | 2020 |
| Status | Current | Discontinued |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | unknown | Rolex 3135 |
| Winding | unknown | Automatic |
| Power reserve | unknown | 48 hours |
| Jewels | unknown | 31 |
| Frequency | unknown | 28,800 vph |
| Complications | unknown | Date |