Comparison
Cyma W02-00823-001 vs Grand Seiko STGK015G
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Cyma W02-00823-001 is 1 mm larger (28 mm vs 27 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
- Grand Seiko STGK015G has the longer power reserve (50 vs 42 hours).
| Spec | W02-00823-001 | STGK015G |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Cyma | Grand Seiko |
| Family | Signature | Elegance |
| Reference | W02-00823-001 | STGK015G |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | unknown |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 28 mm | 27 mm |
| Cyma W02-00823-001 is 1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | Sellita SW100 | Seiko 9S2 |
| Winding | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power reserve | 42 hours | 50 hourslonger |
| Jewels | 25 | unknown |
| Frequency | 28,800 vph | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |