Comparison
Cyma W02-00823-001 vs Rado R10260152
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Cyma W02-00823-001 is 0.5 mm larger (28 mm vs 27.5 mm).
- Cyma W02-00823-001 has a stainless steel case; Rado R10260152 is in ceramic.
| Spec | W02-00823-001 | R10260152 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Cyma | Rado |
| Family | Signature | Anatom |
| Reference | W02-00823-001 | R10260152 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Ceramic |
| Diameter | 28 mm | 27.5 mm |
| Cyma W02-00823-001 is 0.5 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | Sellita SW100 | unknown |
| Winding | Automatic | unknown |
| Power reserve | 42 hours | unknown |
| Jewels | 25 | unknown |
| Frequency | 28,800 vph | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |