Comparison
Ebel 1216388A vs Rado R27080172
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Rado R27080172 is 0.2 mm larger (29.2 mm vs 29 mm).
- Ebel 1216388A has a yellow gold case; Rado R27080172 is in titanium.
| Spec | 1216388A | R27080172 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ebel | Rado |
| Family | Sport | True |
| Reference | 1216388A | R27080172 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Yellow gold | Titanium |
| Diameter | 29 mm | 29.2 mm |
| Rado R27080172 is 0.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | unknown | unknown |