Comparison
Hublot 565.NX.1470.LR.1604 vs Orient RA-AC0M11Y30B-UM00F112J0
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Orient RA-AC0M11Y30B-UM00F112J0 is 0.4 mm larger (38.4 mm vs 38 mm).
- Hublot 565.NX.1470.LR.1604 has a titanium case; Orient RA-AC0M11Y30B-UM00F112J0 is in stainless steel.
| Spec | 565.NX.1470.LR.1604 | RA-AC0M11Y30B-UM00F112J0 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Hublot | Orient |
| Family | Classic | Bambino |
| Reference | 565.NX.1470.LR.1604 | RA-AC0M11Y30B-UM00F112J0 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | unknown | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Titanium | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 38 mm | 38.4 mm |
| Orient RA-AC0M11Y30B-UM00F112J0 is 0.4 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | unknown | Orient F6724 |
| Winding | unknown | Automatic |
| Power reserve | unknown | 40 hours |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |