Comparison
Ingersoll I16101 vs Laco Uhrenmanufaktur 861704
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Ingersoll I16101 is 0.2 mm larger (46 mm vs 45.8 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
| Spec | I16101 | 861704 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ingersoll | Laco Uhrenmanufaktur |
| Family | NAISMITH | Ocean |
| Reference | I16101 | 861704 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 46 mm | 45.8 mm |
| Ingersoll I16101 is 0.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | unknown | ETA 2824.2 |
| Winding | unknown | Automatic |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |