Comparison
Omega 210.30.42.20.01.001 vs Tudor M25600TN
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Both cases measure 42 mm across.
- Omega 210.30.42.20.01.001 has a stainless steel case; Tudor M25600TN is in titanium.
| Spec | 210.30.42.20.01.001 | M25600TN |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Omega | Tudor |
| Family | Seamaster | Pelagos |
| Reference | 210.30.42.20.01.001 | M25600TN |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Titanium |
| Diameter | 42 mm | 42 mm |
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | Omega 8800 | unknown |
| Winding | Automatic | unknown |
| Power reserve | 55 hours | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | 25,200 vph | unknown |
| Complications | Date | unknown |