Comparison
Orient RA-AC0Q01B30B vs Seiko HCC006J1
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Orient RA-AC0Q01B30B is 0.3 mm larger (39.9 mm vs 39.6 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
| Spec | RA-AC0Q01B30B | HCC006J1 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Orient | Seiko |
| Family | Diver | Presage |
| Reference | RA-AC0Q01B30B | HCC006J1 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 39.9 mm | 39.6 mm |
| Orient RA-AC0Q01B30B is 0.3 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | Orient F6722 | unknown |
| Winding | Automatic | unknown |
| Power reserve | 40 hours | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |