Comparison
Orient RE-AT0001L00B vs Rado R30028912
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Rado R30028912 is 0.2 mm larger (39.5 mm vs 39.3 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
| Spec | RE-AT0001L00B | R30028912 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Orient | Rado |
| Family | STAR | Centrix |
| Reference | RE-AT0001L00B | R30028912 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 39.3 mm | 39.5 mm |
| Rado R30028912 is 0.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | Orient F6R42 | unknown |
| Winding | Automatic | unknown |
| Power reserve | 50 hours | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |