Comparison
Tudor 25407N vs Tudor 25827KN
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both belong to the Tudor Pelagos family.
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Tudor 25407N has a titanium case; Tudor 25827KN is in carbon.
- Both movements are rated for 70 hours of power reserve.
| Spec | 25407N | 25827KN |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Tudor | Tudor |
| Family | Pelagos | Pelagos |
| Reference | 25407N | 25827KN |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | unknown | unknown |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Titanium | Carbon |
| Diameter | unknown | unknown |
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | Tudor MT5400 | Tudor MT5813 |
| Winding | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power reserve | 70 hours | 70 hours |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |