Comparison
Casio AE-1200WH vs Titan nu10002wl01
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Titan nu10002wl01 is 0.1 mm larger (42.2 mm vs 42.1 mm).
- Casio AE-1200WH has a resin case; Titan nu10002wl01 is in stainless steel.
| Spec | AE-1200WH | nu10002wl01 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Titan |
| Family | Classic | Titan |
| Reference | AE-1200WH | nu10002wl01 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 42.1 mm | 42.2 mm |
| Titan nu10002wl01 is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3299 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |