Comparison
Casio LRW-200H vs D1 Milano D1-BLXU01
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio LRW-200H is 0.2 mm larger (34.2 mm vs 34 mm).
| Spec | LRW-200H | D1-BLXU01 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | D1 Milano |
| Family | Classic | Black |
| Reference | LRW-200H | D1-BLXU01 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | unknown |
| Diameter | 34.2 mm | 34 mm |
| Casio LRW-200H is 0.2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3363 | Miyota GL22 |
| Winding | unknown | Quartz |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |