Comparison
Casio LRW-200H vs Titan nt68015pp02
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use a quartz movement.
- Casio LRW-200H is 0.1 mm larger (34.2 mm vs 34.1 mm).
| Spec | LRW-200H | nt68015pp02 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Casio | Titan |
| Family | Classic | Analog |
| Reference | LRW-200H | nt68015pp02 |
| Production start | unknown | unknown |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Resin | unknown |
| Diameter | 34.2 mm | 34.1 mm |
| Casio LRW-200H is 0.1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber | Casio 3363 | unknown |
| Winding | unknown | unknown |
| Power reserve | unknown | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | unknown | unknown |
| Complications | unknown | unknown |