Comparison
Omega 210.30.42.20.01.001 vs Rolex 116610LN
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Omega 210.30.42.20.01.001 is 2 mm larger (42 mm vs 40 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
- Omega 210.30.42.20.01.001 has the longer power reserve (55 vs 48 hours).
- Omega 210.30.42.20.01.001 is in current production; Rolex 116610LN is discontinued.
| Spec | 210.30.42.20.01.001 | 116610LN |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Omega | Rolex |
| Family | Seamaster | Submariner |
| Reference | 210.30.42.20.01.001 | 116610LN |
| Production start | unknown | 2010 |
| Production end | unknown | 2020 |
| Status | Current | Discontinued |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 42 mm | 40 mm |
| Omega 210.30.42.20.01.001 is 2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | Omega 8800 | Rolex 3135 |
| Winding | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power reserve | 55 hourslonger | 48 hours |
| Jewels | unknown | 31 |
| Frequency | 25,200 vph | 28,800 vph |
| Complications | Date | Date |