Comparison
Omega 310.30.42.50.01.001 vs Rolex 116500LN
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Omega 310.30.42.50.01.001 uses a manual movement; Rolex 116500LN uses an automatic one.
- Omega 310.30.42.50.01.001 is 2 mm larger (42 mm vs 40 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
- Rolex 116500LN entered production first (2016 vs 2021).
- Omega 310.30.42.50.01.001 is in current production; Rolex 116500LN is discontinued.
| Spec | 310.30.42.50.01.001 | 116500LN |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Omega | Rolex |
| Family | Speedmaster | Daytona |
| Reference | 310.30.42.50.01.001 | 116500LN |
| Nicknames | Moonwatch | unknown |
| Production start | 2021 | 2016 |
| Production end | unknown | unknown |
| Status | Current | Discontinued |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 42 mm | 40 mm |
| Omega 310.30.42.50.01.001 is 2 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Manual | Automatic |
| Caliber | Omega 3861 | unknown |
| Winding | Manual | unknown |
| Power reserve | 50 hours | unknown |
| Jewels | unknown | unknown |
| Frequency | 21,600 vph | unknown |
| Complications | Chronograph | unknown |