Comparison
Rolex 116610LN vs Tudor M79030N
Sourced specs side by side. A value is highlighted only where one is objectively greater (power reserve); size and the rest are a matter of taste. unknown means no sourced value yet.
At a glance
- Both use an automatic movement.
- Rolex 116610LN is 1 mm larger (40 mm vs 39 mm).
- Both cases are stainless steel.
- Tudor M79030N has the longer power reserve (70 vs 48 hours).
- Rolex 116610LN entered production first (2010 vs 2018).
- Tudor M79030N is in current production; Rolex 116610LN is discontinued.
| Spec | 116610LN | M79030N |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Rolex | Tudor |
| Family | Submariner | Black Bay |
| Reference | 116610LN | M79030N |
| Nicknames | unknown | BB58 |
| Production start | 2010 | 2018 |
| Production end | 2020 | unknown |
| Status | Discontinued | Current |
| Retail price | unknown | unknown |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Diameter | 40 mm | 39 mm |
| Rolex 116610LN is 1 mm larger | ||
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Caliber | Rolex 3135 | Tudor MT5402 |
| Winding | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power reserve | 48 hours | 70 hourslonger |
| Jewels | 31 | unknown |
| Frequency | 28,800 vph | 28,800 vph |
| Complications | Date | unknown |